![]()
Just want to throw this out there because it’s been bothering me for awhile.
You don’t need me to tell you that the nation’s swung hard to the right ever since our esteemed Leader took over piloting the ship and has been looking for icebergs to ram ever since. I’m greatly troubled by the fact that a lot of the damage being done can’t be undone, or will take a long, long time to repair. This includes damaging the environment, intrusions on privacy, and warping the language. It’s that last one that I’ve been stewing over lately.
Smarter people than me have already pointed out that the language of politics has changed, where “liberal” is a dirty word, and being on the right is synonymous with being patriotic while being on the left is akin to being a traitor. We’re also distorting how we define ourselves as American. Instead of a melting pot of diversity, I guess we’re starting to believe that an American is white, Christian, and middle-class (even though the rich are getting richer while the rest of us the country remains stagnant.)
My big concern in this regard is the increasing number of attacks on “political correctness.” Just as being liberal has come to mean “ineffectual and weak,” political correctness has come to mean foolishness that tip-toes around the Truth. So if we, as a nation, no longer see the point of being p.c., that more or less gives the green light for racism and (less overtly) sexism.
Constructing the “other” gives those in power a lot of control, and right now membership to the “other” is pretty inclusive. The easiest way to qualify for being the “other” is to be non-Christian. If you’re non-religious then you’re also amoral (or outright immoral) and a danger to our Christian nation’s founding. If you’re Muslim, you’re one step removed from being a murderer. Another way to qualify as the “other” is to be non-white. Because we hear so much about the immigration policy, I guess it’s safe to assume that all Hispanics are illegals and ought not to be here. Or if your life was washed away by Katrina, we’ll give you some sympathy but not much else. Rebuild! That’s what we would do. Because the country is founded on personal responsibility, not receiving hand-outs. Oh, it almost goes without saying that if you live outside our nation’s borders, you’re an “other.” Unless you agree with all of our policies. Then you’re okay. For now.
Language has a lot to do with perceptions, and political correctness is a method by which you’re supposed to check your assumptions. To take a moment and put yourself in the shoes of the “other.” So when I see chain emails lauding the sheer stupidity of ignorant assholes it makes me sick. The fact that the good professor can’t distinguish between a religious faith on one hand and a violent political agenda on the other is disturbing; and the fact that he lumps all Muslims together as if they’re one homogeneous, unilaterally thinking group suggests he’s never known a Muslim, much less two. The tone in the email is unmistakeable as Wichman assumes the voice of dominance and authority as the “American” while the students cast in the role of the “other,” and his message is definitive: this is the way things are here.
The subtle shift in language has also spilled over into the abortion debate, where being “pro-choice” is rapidly becoming defined as “pro-death.” I fear that this battle looms on the horizon and I’m a bit uneasy in this era of the gung-ho “kill the killers” mentality we’ve got going on here.
In 1998, an abortion doctor was murdered in New York State. Gov. Pataki called it “terrorism” at the time but that word didn’t quite mean the same thing back then, did it? On these shores, the most politically active anti-choice (the language war goes both ways) groups are fundamentalist Christians who claim moral superiorty; they argue murdering an abortion provider saves countless lives and is therefore just in the eyes of God. Maybe I should go on a rampage lambasting Christians (as a homogeneous, unilaterally thinking group) the next time an abortion provider is murdered.
Political correctness doesn’t stop violent people from commiting violent acts. But learning to see the world through someone else’s eyes has a funny way of defusing that violent impulse. And heaven forbid we, as a culture, deplore violence as a legitimate (if not preferred) way for resolving a conflict.
But check that thought. There’s more money to be made by war than peace, we’re easier to control when the world is seen as black and white and when we’re made to believe everyone’s out to get us.
To think otherwise is positively un-American.
Current Mood: Pissed Off | ![]()
Currently Listening To – Bob Dylan – “Modern Times”
6 Comments
Where do you get such pinko lefto ideas? Oh, I see — you’re listening to that Dylan guy. He shoulda been put in prison and left to rot in that Alice’s Restaraunt debacle with all those other hippies.
Otherwise, well said, Mr. Trent.
Personally I think things will start swinging the other way when people begin to realize that it’s not the p.c. liberals who are costing them all that tax money anymore… I heard this bit on NPR this morning that the city of Houston wanted to put Katrina refugees in apartments, but FEMA insisted they be put in hotel rooms for much more money. Houston stood their ground and should’ve made everyone happier. But I’m sure they’ll be punished somehow. (grin) It certainly doesn’t jibe with punishing the Katrina survivors for having been poor and unable to get out of Hell on their own in the first place.
There’s a whole lot of rhetoric that really translates to punishing people these days…
Dr. Phil
Is it not eerily Orwellian that the very people who find politically correct/aware/conscious speech risible and foolish are the same people who manipulate language with such brazen euphemisms as “death tax” and “rendition”?
On the other hand, when the leader of the free world can’t be relied upon to correctly pronounce a two-syllable word like “nuclear,” what other depredations against language are out of bounds?
I way out on the left and understand that I’m an extremist, so it really boils my cheese to hear guys like Kerry and Dean being labeled as “liberals” when they’re far too conservative for my liking—centrist, in fact. And that goes double for the people on the right who don’t understand that Bush is very conservative socially, yet contrary to conversative politics has actually added to the scope of the federal government rather than diminished it through programs like No Child Left Behind. Which is what drives me crazy about the myth of the liberal media—I’m a raving liberal folks, and I’m telling you that the “balanced” reporting we’re getting gives this disaster of an administration pass, after pass, after pass.
So many contradictions in today’s politics it drives me nuts. The rich people lobbying for tax breaks are the ones milking the federal government to begin with. Even a remotely politically aware person would foresake both parties at this stage of the game for being corporate whores and protecting only those special interest groups who can ante up.
And to your point, John, it’s deliberate and Those In Power are laughing down their sleeves at the ignorant public sucking it up. Makes me puke.
Smarter people than me have already pointed out that the language of politics has changed, where “liberal� is a dirty word, and being on the right is synonymous with being patriotic while being on the left is akin to being a traitor. We’re also distorting how we define ourselves as American. Instead of a melting pot of diversity, I guess we’re starting to believe that an American is white, Christian, and middle-class
Writa, please. These are all straw men, made up by left wing zealots who want to make you hate the Other. The Other, in this case, being me.
I’m a right winger. I read right wing and libertarian publications and websites. I don’t see these attitudes. What, Ann Coulter? Ann Coulter is a nut. No one, left or right, takes her seriously.
I see a lot of paranoid thinking on the left. I don’t know where it’s coming from, or who’s drumming it up, but it ain’t healthy.
For a real view of the thinking on the right, read these:
The Weekly Standard. The major popular neo-con publication.
Reason. The major libertarian publication.
Marginal Revolution. Group blog by libertarian economists. Lots more fun than it sounds. :)
Virgina Postrel and Jane Galt, libertarian bloggers.
Trent, even in Power Line, which is about as reflexively pro-Bush as you can get, I don’t see attitudes like the ones you describe.
Seriously, read non-lefty stuff for a while. You won’t agree with it all. *I* don’t agree with it all. But it will give you a more realistic idea of what the right actually thinks.
I don’t see these attitudes.
Um. I’m talking about Dick Cheney. I’m talking about Donald Rumsfeld. I’m talking about Dubya. Not the media outlets. Because the administration carefully controls who gets into the press conferences you know, and those oh-so-phony town meetings.
I’m mostly talking about my personal interactions. People I know sneer at the mention of “liberals.” People rant at the biased “liberal media.” People I know well blame victims of Katrina and were appaled at the number of “illegals” who turned out for immigration demonstrations. Many still believe Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11 and all Muslims are violent by nature.
The discourse has changed. I read very little lefty stuff, besides maybe Slate occasionally. People trust this president and his administration and they shouldn’t. I’m not saying Clinton and the democrats are much better, but Osama Bin Laden and Monica Lewinski are two different affairs entirely (pun intended.) To call Fox News the response to the “leftist” CNN is ridiculous. Bill O’Reilly is talking pure shit whenever he’s not outright lying. Which isn’t often.
The fact that more conservatives aren’t outraged by Bush depresses me. The fact that W and the Brotherhood of Evil are pushing a religious agenda that breaks down the barrier between church and state disturbs me.
Personally, I’m not against conservatives. I have a lot in common with libertarians, except for the fact that I think leaving everything to the free market would be a social disaster. What I don’t like is how the public at large has turned off their critical thinking capabilities and are swallowing the lies of this administration hook, line, and sinker. And I don’t need Al Franken or Bill Maher to tell me that too many people I’ve dealt with over the past few years have been getting increasingly less tolerant of people not like them—gays, people of color, and non-Christians.
And sorry your initial comment got spam blocked, John—too many hyperlinks and it needed to be manually approved.
And no, it doesn’t automatically screen comments with the words “I’m a right winger” in the text.
One Trackback
[...] This is another example of what I was talking about yesterday. No, moron, people aren’t objecting to Hasselbeck’s breakdown because the liberal media doesn’t want to give equal time to an opposing viewpoint. The problem is that Hasselbeck—former footwear designer, game show contestant, and now daytime talk host—is #$%^ing medically, factually wrong in what she said regarding Plan B. Or does truth in public dialogue even matter anymore? [...]