A Comparison of Champions

/

A few years ago I started tracking the champions of European soccer leagues in a database to see if I could see any definite trend in competitiveness after the introduction of major advertising revenues via television rights deals, which exploded in the early nineties. I also wanted to compare them against the major US sports to compare turnover, meaning how many times new champions were crowned. I dropped them into a grid going back to 1984 (twenty-six years) and the results surprised me. (full tables below the cut)

First off, from looking at a list of champions alone, you can’t say that things changed dramatically for European soccer. In each of the big five leagues, the champions have always come from a very select few teams. In England, they’ve had 3 different teams win the title in 6 years; not so bad considering that the number only increases to 7 if you go all the way back to 1984. Also, I was surprised to see that the other European leagues had been just as static over that time period. Italy leads the pack with 9 different champs since 1984. The numbers look even worse if you toss out the teams that have only won one championship; Spain’s the worst offender as it really just boils down to two teams in Real Madrid and Barcelona, with Valencia winning twice and Atletico Madrid, Deportivo La Coruna, and Atletico Bilbao only topping the table once.

This stands in stark contrast with US sports, whose leagues have tried to maintain a higher level of parity. Even though it seems like dynasties are fairly common in US sports, the table shows quite a bit of turnover: fourteen and fifteen different champs for NFL and NHL, a whopping nineteen for MLB, leaving only the NBA as having numbers similar to the European leagues with 9. Only the Champions League (formerly European Cup) comes close to those numbers with fourteen different winners. Of course, there are a couple important variables: it’s cup competition not a league, and it runs concurrently with a domestic league season.

This data also discounts the fact that many of these title races go right down to the wire, but it also reveals the fact that certain teams always seem to win out in the end. Still, it’s hard to see how an eighteen-team, single-table European league wouldn’t be significantly more competitive and perhaps more interesting. I also can’t see a salary cap being put in place anytime soon, considering the clout these major European teams have, and there’s also no denying that the rich have become richer and that vying for these domestic league titles is a very, very expensive proposition.

Draw what conclusions you will.

  Spain England Italy Germany France
2009 Barcelona Man
Utd
Inter Wolfsburg Bordeaux
2008 Real Madrid Man Utd Inter Bayern Mun Lyon
2007 Real Madrid Man Utd Inter vfb Stuttgart Lyon
2006 Barcelona Chelsea Inter Bayern Mun Lyon
2005 Barcelona Chelsea none Bayern Mun Lyon
2004 Valencia Arsenal AC Milan Bayern Mun Lyon
2003 Real Madrid Man Utd Juventus Bayern Mun Lyon
2002 Valencia Arsenal Juventus Bor Dortmund Lyon
2001 Real Madrid Man Utd Roma Bayern Mun Nantes
2000 Deportivo Man Utd Lazio Bayern Mun Monaco
1999 Barcelona Man Utd AC Milan Bayern Mun Bordeaux
1998 Barcelona Arsenal Juventus Kaiserslautern Lens
1997 Real Madrid Man Utd Juventus Bayern Mun Monaco
1996 Atl Madrid Man Utd AC Milan Bor Dortmund Auxerre
1995 Real Madrid Blackburn Juventus Bor Dortmund Nantes
1994 Barcelona Man Utd AC Milan Bayern Mun PSG
1993 Barcelona Man Utd AC Milan Werder Bremen None
1992 Barcelona Leeds AC Milan vfb Stuttgart Marseilles
1991 Barcelona Arsenal Sampdoria Kaiserslautern Marseilles
1990 Real Madrid Liverpool Napoli Bayern Mun Marseilles
1989 Real Madrid Arsenal Inter Bayern Mun Monaco
1988 Real Madrid Liverpool AC Milan Werder Bremen Bordeaux
1987 Real Madrid Everton Napoli Bayern Mun Bordeaux
1986 Real Madrid Liverpool Juventus Bayern Mun PSG
1985 Barcelona Everton Verona Bayern Mun Bordeaux
1984 Atl Bilbao Liverpool Juventus vfb Stuttgart Bordeaux
 Champs
6
7
9
6
8

 

  Euro
Champ
NFL MLB NBA NHL
2009 Barcelona Pittsburgh      
2008 Man Utd NY Giants Philadelphia Boston Detroit
2007 AC Milan Indianapolis Boston San Antonio Anaheim
2006 Barcelona Pittsburgh St. Louis Miami Carolina
2005 Liverpool New England Chicago San Antonio none
2004 Porto New England Boston Detroit Tampa Bay
2003 AC Milan Tampa Bay Florida San Antonio New Jersey
2002 Real Madrid New England Anaheim LA Detroit
2001 Bayern Mun Baltimore Arizona LA Colorado
2000 Real Madrid St. Louis Yankees LA New Jersey
1999 Man Utd Denver Yankees San Antonio Dallas
1998 Real Madrid Denver Yankees Chicago Detroit
1997 Bor Dortmund Green Bay Florida Chicago Detroit
1996 Juventus Dallas Yankees Chicago Colorado
1995 Ajax San Francisco Atlanta Houston New Jersey
1994 AC Milan Dallas None Houston New York
1993 Marseilles Dallas Toronto Chicago Montreal
1992 Barcelona Washington Toronto Chicago Pittsburgh
1991 Red Star NY Giants Minnesota Chicago Pittsburgh
1990 AC Milan San Francisco Cincinnati Detroit Edmonton
1989 AC Milan San Francisco Oakland Detroit Calgary
1988 PSV Washington LA LA Edmonton
1987 Porto NY Giants Minnesota LA Edmonton
1986 Steau Buch Chicago Mets Boston Montreal
1985 Juventus San Francisco Kansas City LA Edmonton
1984 Liverpool LA Raiders Detroit Boston Edmonton
 
14
15
19
9
14

4 Comments

  1. Posted 6/12/2009 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    Still, it’s hard to see how an eighteen-team, single-table European league wouldn’t be significantly more competitive and perhaps more interesting.

    Agreed. I think one of the only ways you’ll ever see the top European leagues (especially England) get any more interesting individually is if you limit the number of automatic Champions League qualifying spots. Champions League money has become an annuity for England’s Top Four, one that gives them an almost perpetual monetary and status advantage (mismanagement of said money, a la Liverpool, notwithstanding). Even if they simply cut the automatic qualifiers to three and let the FA Cup winner into the CL instead of the UEoFA League, there would at least be a stiffer fight for third and for the cup.

    Of course, it will never ever happen.

  2. Posted 6/15/2009 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    As a long-time Cubs fan, I should point out that MLB has TWO Chicago teams. You do need to distinguish them. (grin)

    Go Leeds! (my maternal grandmother, who died in the 1930s, was from Leeds)

    Dr. Phil

  3. Trent Hergenrader
    Posted 6/15/2009 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    Phil, I was only comparing professional teams. Sorry.

    Leeds United is actually the textbook tragic/cautionary tale for medium-sized clubs. They mortgaged the house to bring in loads of expensive players to vie with the European powerhouses and, for a couple three years it worked. Then they went through a bad patch, didn’t qualify for the Champions League (which meant losing all kinds of crazy money) and the bottom fell out. They were relegated twice and now reside in third tier of English football. This would be like the Cubbies coming close to winning the World Series and three years later find themselves playing in double-A baseball on front of a few hundred people.

    You can read Wikipedia’s summaries here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeds_United#1996.E2.80.932001:_Living_the_Dream

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeds_United#2001-2004:_Financial_implosion

  4. Trent
    Posted 6/15/2009 at 5:14 pm | Permalink

    John, sorry your comment got tangled in the spam queue. (I bet it was from the word “stiffer” if you can believe it.)

    But yeah, I would love to see the Champions League be for, you know, champions. I’d love to see league winners and domestic cup winners go into the current Champions League and have teams 2-4 or 2-5 go to a much sterner UEFASuperLiga thingy.

    Of course, that’s very close to how it used to work and it was the big boys who whined about missing out on so much revenue year after year. The gap is so wide now that the top teams’ reserve sides are better than most of the other teams in the league, and I know people alleged Mourinho snapped up guys like Glen Johnson and Wayne Bridge not to play them, but to keep other teams from having them. Great…

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*